The Only Thing That Comes Out of Your Mouth Is Your Reputation
You know within the first sentence of an email whether you want to read it. Sometimes you know before you even open it. The words haven't had a chance to matter yet. The sender already does.
You've sat in a room and felt the energy shift when a particular leader starts talking. Nothing dramatic happens. People find somewhere else to look, adjust in their seats, and wait for it to be over. You've heard someone speak to a full group in language that sounds nothing like how they talk one on one. Every word chosen so precisely that everyone listening knows there is another version of the conversation somewhere else.
And you've been in a meeting where a leader asked what people really thought and watched the room calculate. How honest should I be? How much do they really want to hear? What happens if I say what I'm actually thinking?
Nobody has to ask those questions out loud. We recognize the calculation because we've made it ourselves.
There is research behind what you're experiencing. Emotional memory has long been studied, including why experiences carrying emotion stay with us differently than more neutral ones. Recent research from the University of Chicago found that emotional arousal can strengthen how experiences are encoded into memory.
You don't need the research to recognize it. Think about someone you trust completely. When that person says, "Tell me what you really think," you don't spend much time wondering what they mean. Now think about someone who makes you hesitate when they say exactly the same thing.
The words didn't change. Your experience with the person did.
You remember what happened last time. You remember what they did with the information. You remember how disagreement was received. You remember whether raising the problem helped or simply made the problem yours. That history comes with you into the next conversation.
And it changes what you do.
You may still answer every question truthfully while giving the shorter version. You may leave out the complication you know will derail the conversation, wait until you have more certainty before bringing bad news, or decide a particular disagreement isn't worth having. Nobody lied, but the information that reached the conversation changed.
This is where it becomes more than a communication issue.
We've spent a lot of time in The Data Trap talking about adaptation. People work around processes that don't fit the work, compensate for staffing gaps, absorb what the organization hasn't accounted for, and find ways to keep things moving.
I've asked you to look for those adaptations because they tell you something about the conditions surrounding the work.
Why would we assume people don't adapt to us?
People adapt to leaders too.
Think about the people who work with you most closely. Do they bring you problems before they have solutions? Will they tell you they think you're wrong? When you ask, "What am I missing?" do you ever hear something you genuinely weren't expecting? When someone brings you bad news, what happens in the first thirty seconds of that conversation?
Those aren't questions about whether you're a good leader. They're questions about what people have learned from working with you.
Over time, people learn what to bring you and what not to bring you. They learn how much explanation is useful, how disagreement will be received, and whether the door you say is always open actually feels open when they walk through it.
At the same time, you're trying to understand the organization from the information that reaches you. You're trying to understand why the number moved, why a problem keeps returning, why an initiative isn't producing what you expected, or why what you're hearing in the leadership meeting doesn't quite match what you're seeing elsewhere.
What if your own reputation has shaped the information you're using to figure that out?
That's a harder question.
For sixteen editions, we've looked at decisions, processes, priorities, workarounds, staffing, and benchmarks. There is one condition we haven't spent much time examining.
You may be one of them.
Go back to the beginning of this edition. Think about the email you knew something about before you read it, the leader who changed the energy in the room, or the person who asked for an honest opinion while everyone quietly decided how honest to be. You knew what those moments meant because you had a history with the person communicating.
Now turn it around.
What happens when your name appears in someone's inbox? What changes when you start talking? When you say, "Tell me what you really think," does the person across from you have to calculate?
You probably can't answer those questions entirely by yourself. That's part of the point. Other people have been building your communication reputation from their experiences with you.
What have people learned from their experience with you that changes what they are willing to tell you?
Because the only thing that comes out of your mouth is your reputation.
What are people learning from working with you?
Executive coaching gives senior healthcare leaders a place to examine the patterns that are difficult to see from inside the role, including how their decisions, communication, and responses shape what people bring them, what they leave out, and how they adapt.
If you're wondering what people may have learned from working with you that you can't see for yourself, that's a useful place for us to start.
Comments